Obama, not courts should interpret law (updated)

On September 18, newly elected czar Cass Sunstein stated that Obama, and not the courts should interpret law.

JERUSALEM – The interpretation of federal law should be made not by judges but by the beliefs and commitments of the U.S. president and those around him, according to President Obama’s newly confirmed regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein. “There is no reason to believe that in the face of statutory ambiguity, the meaning of federal law should be settled by the inclinations and predispositions of federal judges. The outcome should instead depend on the commitments and beliefs of the President and those who operate under him,” argued Sunstein. -Source = WorldNetDaily September 18, 2009 by Aaron Klein

Allowing one man to establish law makes for an exact replica of Vatican hierarchy wherein the Pope makes all the decisions for the land, and rightly so since the Vatican has taken control of D.C since Reagan handed it to them in his second term. This most recent ‘Czar’ of Obama, (47 so far) This most recent ‘czar’ of Obama,(47 so far) who just announced (on 9/29/09) that government should fund abortions, proves what many feared would eventually happen in the USA if Roman prelates had their way in D.C. Truth is, those of us that study current events linked to prophecy knew this was their plan all along seeing how they announced this long ago…

The old Protestant culture is about at the end of its rope… Why can’t we make the U.S. Catholic in legislation, Catholic in justice, aims and ideals?” –Father F. X. Talbot, editor of America, official jesuit magazine for the U.S. statement in New York Globe Dec. 14, 1930

In the book Confusion Twice Confounded, Monsignor Joseph H. Brady states that the U.S. Supreme Court is wrong in decisions regarding seperation of Church and State.” He says: “A sound view of the Constitution in its relation to religion probably awaits a change in personnel in our highest tribunal.” –The Register, Jan. 23, 1955.

But Constitutions can be changed, and non-Catholic sects may decline to such a point that the political proscription [ban] of them may become feasible and expedient. What protection would they have against a Catholic state?” –The State and the Church, pp.38,39, by Miller and Ryan, imprimatur of Cardinal Hayes.

“If Catholics ever gain sufficient numerical majority in this country, religious freedom is at an end. So our enemies say; so we believe” –The Shephard of the Valley, journal of the late bishop of St. Louis.

Now do you see why the U.S. Supreme court just elected another Catholic to the bench making it 6 to 3 in favor of Rome? When you look at how Obama was touted as a Messiah during his campaign and how on September 29, a group in Chicago held public prayer “to Obama“,  you can see that Obama is in fact being worshipped as a Roman Emperor, just like Herod of old. I say Herod, because the ultimate worship was always saved for Caesar. Who is it today that claims to be that Caesar in agreement with Christian prophecy?

Pope Pius IX, in his “Discorsi” (I., p. 253), said:  “The Caesar who now addresses you, and to whom alone are obedience and fidelity due.” – “…superior papal authority and dominion is derived from the law of the Caesars.Lucius Ferraris, in “Prompta Bibliotheca Canonica, Juridica, Moralis, Theologica, Ascetica, Polemica, Rubristica, Historica”, Volume V, article on “Papa, Article II”, titled “Concerning the extent of Papal dignity, authority, or dominion and infallibility”, #19, published in Petit-Montrouge (Paris) by J. P. Migne, 1858 edition

For students of prophecy this is of no surprise. In fact, it’s expected if the powers that be wish to have the mass control granted to emperors. An emperor, or male monarch, is usually considered the sovereign ruler of a nation. Emperors are generally recognized to be above all kings and queens in both honor and rank. It used to be the USA, and other nations were to be considered sovereign nations on their own. Now, as the New World Order comes to fruition, they see a need to appoint a man, as did Rome of old, to stand as sovereign over the nation. Without this ability, Rome’s plans to enforce her prophecied mark comes to naught because then they would have to get Congress, the Senate, and the peopel themselves to agree to pass certain laws. But if it’s one man as Obama’s most recent Czar suggests, then everything works much simpler for the antichrist in Rome.

Historic fact is, the very first time the devil was able to enforce Sunday observance by law was on March 7, 321A.D. under the rule of Roman Emperor Constantine. Like back then, this edict required all citizens to rest on “the venerable day of the sun” as a way to twist Scriptures out of context so as to make people believe the seventh day Sabbath was a Jewish thing, regardless of the fact it was kept in Eden 2500 years before a Jew was ever born. And yes, since it happened so long ago, Sunday keeping pastors forget the historic fact that all Christians kept the seventh day Sabbath until 321A.D. That’s 290 years after when most preachers teach Sunday sacredness began. History proves these pastors to be liars, or ignorant of the facts at the very least. Constantine only enforced this law after becoming a Catholic. Is this why Obama is planning to convert to Catholicism? Is this why Newt Gingrich became Catholic in march of 2009? Is this why Tony Blaire converted to Catholicism in December of 2007? Is this why Jeb Bush converted to Catholicism back in 1995? That’s right, they know where the power is, and they know they cannot hope to become a Herod in one of the ten regions the club of Rome has laid out as the prophecied ten kingdoms they separated the planet into unless they bow to the Pope as Caesar.

Posted September 27, 2009 by Nicholas in poGm Gloss

Tagged with , , , ,

%d bloggers like this: